Semantic Art on Google
Google is semantically illiterate. A blunt statement and here is the proof, is it?
Today Google Search returns the following on Semantic Art:
Â
Semantic Art on Google
The top ranking article from YORGOO Publishing looks as follows, in fact, it’s not even an article:
Â
Semantic Art on YORGOO Publishing
Amazing to reach a listing with some nonsense, or am I wrong? May be I am and may be Google is smarter than I ever thought: They must have understood exactly what the meaning was of that post and what I intended to say:“I want to go to Google’s Top 10 on Semantic Art.” yes, they understood and they are gullible: my little present helped to bribe that spider, huh.
I know now: Google loves me! Yes, and they show it well with all the attention I get. Watch this: if you type Semantic Art Images into the Google Search box you get:
Â
Semantic Art Image on Google
Now this is extremely surprising: not only has Google given me top listing, but this smartest of all smart spiders has detected and  extracted the most important and deeply philosophical center piece of that genius post: just read above on the screenshot!
Incredible and just note: I had not defined an excerpt when editing and Google did not pick up the default 55 first words from WordPress, but they found the deep essence well hidden in the post.
Anyone else still claiming that Google is a semantic nutshell or fruit cake?
Oh, I just forgot: Semantic Art News is another good keyword and here we definitely excell:
Â
Semantic Art News on Google
A separate screenshot for the bottom two is needed here:
Â
Semantic Art Image 4
The semantic beauty is in thefact that Bianca Published my nonsense and I publish her smart stuff …:-). Which is also true for Yorgo Nestoridis News, Â while YORGOO Press takes a mixed stand.
All this is pure semantic coincidence and just the image of a moment: I guess in a few days all my nonsense will have disappeared from any top ranking, or not?
Related posts:
